![]() ![]() 84 Accent – cooler leaning, harder surface making it paler on application, same finely ground shimmer.80 Jersey – similar colour family but a few degrees lighter, powdery yet silky application, no visible shimmer but does bear a gorgeous satiny sheen.Looking through my collection of CHANEL blushes, I pulled out the two I thought would be quite close to 260 Alezane, but as the photos and swatches below show, they are nothing alike. A light sweep using a fan-shaped brush, provides a gentle hint of colour to help balance out a stronger eye (as seen in the photo above), but that excellent mix of dusky rose & neutral hues also means you can easily intensify the colour - without the fear of looking overdone. Initial appearances might lead you to think that this is a soft shade, but there are hidden depths here as well, with an impressive staying power to sweeten the deal (especially when worn over foundation).ĬHANEL | Joues Contraste Alezane Powder Blush swatches Warm leaning in tone, this blush is actually quite pigmented, so I suggest beginning with a light hand and building from there. Fragranced with CHANEL’s signature rose scent, the shimmer is clearly visible in the pan but the powder is so ultra-finely milled that it melds seamlessly upon the skin with application. ![]() Joues Contraste Alezane Powder Blush (CAN $51.00)| Described as “brownish pink with golden shimmer”, Alezane is definitely all that, but I also detect peach, tan & rose tints as well. Rouge Allure Pensive & Rouge Coco Shine TéméraireĬHANEL Collection Les Automnales Fall 2015 ( credit)ĬHANEL | Joues Contraste Alezane Powder Blush.Tissé d’Automne with Stylo Yeux Feuilles & Ardent.Le Vernis Écorce Sanguine, Vert Obscur, Châtaigne.Previously reviewed from this collection: INSPIRATION: willow catkin, eucalyptus leaf Cheek colour can make or break a look, but Joues Contraste 260 Alezane Powder Blush from the CHANEL Les Automnales Collection for Fall 2015, is one of those supremely well-balanced shades, turning it into one of those oh-so-totally wearable hues you’ll be reaching for again and again. We would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to. ![]() easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. you can identify that a product is rated highly for glow without reading a lot of text. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.Īn added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while frost might be desired for someone else. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.Īs an example, one rating criteria for blush is glow. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. Without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. In the blendability category the rating of four suggests users & critics responses to "how blendable is this product?" tended towards blends easily.Īt blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. Looking at review rankings for the natural looking category the current four indicates in response to the "how natural looking is this product" mainly suggest me only better. Feedback for the colour category an average total of five is a sign that replies to "does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?" generally suggest true to colour. Considering feedback for the long-wearing category a rating of four suggests evaluating "how long-wearing is this product?" generally favor stays all day. Reviewing the easy to apply category an average of four suggests reviewers when asked "how easy to apply did you find this product?" usually favor applies itself. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |